| Annotation: |
Introduction: the dynamic development of the legal system, the increasing complexity of its elements and links between them draw attention to the application of theoretical constructions in discipline-specific research. First of all, this contributes to defining a clear methodological basis for the study of new legal institutions, this being the key to obtaining reasoned, consistent, and motivated conclusions and proposals. Currently, the most relevant and popular research areas include legal regulation of the use of artificial intelligence systems, robotic technologies, digitalization of legal proceedings, etc. There are many proposals and solutions suggested by legal scholars on these issues, but analysis shows significant discrepancies in the definition of basic concepts, in the understanding of the essence of legal relations as well as the prerequisites for their occurrence, the procedure and reasons for imposition of legal liability, etc. These contradictions are externalized in the current legislation. Purpose: to determine the importance of using legal engineering techniques for the regulation of relations involving the application of artificial intelligence systems. Methods: the key research tools are concepts and laws of interdisciplinary fields of knowledge: general systems theory, theory of information, cybernetics, theory of management; the systematic approach made it possible to characterize the existing forms of law implementation and also legal engineering techniques in the conceptual apparatus of the theory of law as well as to identify the specific features of law implementation techniques; formal legal method; comparative legal method. Results: we carried out comprehensive scientific research on the forms of law implementation; the study revealed specific features of the application of the means, techniques, and methods of legal engineering in all forms of law implementation. We also analyzed civil proceedings through the prism of digitalization, application of modern information and telecommunications technologies in legal activities and legal proceedings; the effect of the use of legal engineering techniques on the effectiveness of these processes was determined.
|
| References: |
1. Aleksandrov A. S. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika – sudebnaya lingvistika – grammatika prava [Legal Technique – Forensic Linguistics – Grammar of Law]. Problemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki: sbornik statey [Problems of Legal Technique: collected articles]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. Pp. 101–105. (In Russ.).
2. Alekseev S. S. Obshchaya teoriya prava [General Theory of Law: in 2 vols.]. Moscow, 1982. Vol. 2. 359 p. (In Russ.).
3. Alekseev S. S. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works: in 10 vols.]. Moscow, 2010. Vol. 8. 480 p. (In Russ.).
4. Alikperov Kh. D. Komp'yuternaya programma opredeleniya mery nakazaniya [Computer Program for Determining the Punishment]. Baku, 2019. 212 p. (In Russ.).
5. Alikperov Kh. D. Elektronnaya tekhnologiya opredeleniya mery nakazaniya [Electronic Technology for Determining the Punishment]. St. Petersburg, 2020. 170 p. (In Russ.).
6. Baisheva Z. V. Russkiy yazyk i kul'tura rechi v yurisprudentsii [The Russian Language and Culture of Speech in Jurisprudence: a textbook]. Moscow, 2002. 193 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bakulin A. F. Sudebnaya zashchita slaboy storony predprinimatel'skogo dogovora [Judicial Protection of the Weaker Party to a Business Agreement]. Sud'ya – Judge. 2019. Issue 8. Pp. 20–27. (In Russ.).
8. Belov V. A. Grazhdanskoe pravo [Civil Law: in 4 vols.]. Vol. II. Obshchaya chast' [General Part: in 2 books]. Book 2. Fakty: uchebnik dlya akademicheskogo bakalavriata i magistratury [Facts: Textbook for Academic Bachelor's and Master's Degree Programs]. Moscow, 2016. 497 p. (In Russ.).
9. Belov V. A. Ponyatiya «potrebitel'» i «sla¬baya storona»: sravnitel'no-pravovoy analiz [The Concepts of 'Consumer' and 'Weaker Party': Comparative Legal Analysis]. Vestnik arbitrazhnoy praktiki – Bulletin of Commercial Proceedings Practice. 2018. Issue 3. Pp. 10–23; Issue 4. Pp. 11–18. (In Russ.).
10. Bibilo V. N. Sudebnyy akt kak yuridicheskiy termin [Judicial Act as a Legal Term]. Vestnik Grodnenskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta imeni Yanki Kupaly. Seriya 4. Pravovedenie – Vesnik of Yanka Kupala State University of Grodno. Series 4. Jurisprudence. 2013. Issue 4. Pp. 6–12. (In Russ.).
11. Brazhnik S. D., Indzhgiya A. M. Pravoprimenitel'naya tekhnika v ugolovnom prave: yuridicheskoe soderzhanie, vidy i granitsy ponyatiya [Law Enforcement Technique in Criminal Law: Legal Content, Types and Boundaries of the Concept]. Yuridicheskaya nauka – Legal Science. 2012. Issue 4. Pp. 53–55. (In Russ.).
12. Vlasenko V.A. Sudebnoe reshenie kak osnovanie ustanovleniya grazhdanskikh prav i obyazannostey: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [A Court Judgment as a Basis for Establishing Civil Rights and Obligations: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Rostov-on-Don, 2011. 28 p. (In Russ.).
13. Vlasenko N. A. Zakonodatel'naya tekhnologiya (Teoriya. Opyt. Pravila) [Legislative Technology (Theory. Experience. Rules): a textbook]. Irkutsk, 2001. 142 p. (In Russ.).
14. Volos A. A. Slabaya storona brachnogo dogovora [The Weaker Party to the Marriage Contract]. Notarius – Notary. 2018. Issue 4. Pp. 26–29. (In Russ.).
15. Golubtsov V. G. Sudebnoe reshenie kak yuridicheskiy fakt v grazhdanskom prave: doktrinal'nyy diskurs i problema legal'nykh formulirovok [Court Judgement as a Jural Fact in Civil Law: Doctrinal Discourse and the Problem of Legal Formulations]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 2. Pp. 240–262. (In Russ.).
16. Gol'tsov V. B., Golovanov N. M. Sudebnoe reshenie kak osnovanie vozniknoveniya, izmeneniya i prekrashcheniya grazhdanskikh prav i obyazannostey [Court Judgment as a Basis for the Emergence, Change and Termination of Civil Rights and Obligations]. Znanie – Knowledge. 2018. Issue 2-2 (54). Pp. 55–62. (In Russ.).
17. Gubaeva T. V. Yazyk i pravo [Language and Law]. Moscow, 2010. 160 p. (In Russ.).
18. Dotsenko T. A. Sushchnost' yuridiches¬kikh konstruktsiy [The Essence of Legal Structures]. Problemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki [Problems of Legal Technique: collected articles]. Ed. by V. M. Baranov. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. Pp. 316–323. (In Russ.).
19. Ermakova E. P., Frolova E. E. Iskusst-vennyy intellekt v grazhdanskom sudoproizvodstve i arbitrazhe: opyt SShA i KNR [Artificial Intelligence in Civil and Arbitration Proceedings: the Experience of the USA and PRC]. Moscow, 2021. 224 p. (In Russ.).
20. Eroshenko A. A. Grazhdansko-pravo-vaya zashchita lichnoy sobstvennosti v SSSR [Civil Law Protection of Personal Property in the USSR]. Sovetskoe gosudarstvo i pravo – Soviet State and Law. 1968. Issue 6. Pp. 106–110. (In Russ.).
21. Zagaynova S. K. Teoreticheskie problemy kharakteristiki sudebnykh aktov v grazhdanskom i arbitrazhnom protsessakh [Theoretical Problems of the Characteristics of Judicial Acts in Civil and Commercial Proceedings]. Problemnye voprosy grazhdanskogo i arbitrazhnogo protsessov [Prob¬lematic Issues of Civil and Commercial Processesю. Ed. by L. F. Lesnitskaya, M. A. Rozh¬kova]. Moscow, 2008. 506 p. (In Russ.).
22. Ivanyuk O. A. Administrativnaya pravoprimenitel'naya yuridicheskaya tekhnika: postanovka problemy [Administrative Law Enforcement Juridical Technique: Statement of the Problem]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika – Juridical Techniques. 2009. Issue 3. Pp. 422–428. (In Russ.).
23. Jhering R. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Legal Technique]. Transl. from German. St. Petersburg, 1906. 229 p. (In Russ.).
24. Kalabekov Sh. V. Dogovor kak universal'naya pravovaya konstruktsiya: avtoref. dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [The Contract as a Universal Legal Structure: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2004. 32 p. (In Russ.).
25. Kartashov V. N. Teoriya pravovoy sistemy obshchestva [The Theory of the Legal System of Society]. Yaroslavl, 2005. 547 p. (In Russ.).
26. Kartashov V. N. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika, taktika, strategiya i tekhnologiya (k voprosu o sootnoshenii) [Legal Technique, Tactics, Strategy and Technology (on the Question of Relationship)]. Problemy yuridicheskoy tekhniki [Problems of Legal Technique: collected articles]. Nizhny Novgorod, 2000. 254 p. (In Russ.).
27. Kashanina T. V. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Legal Technique]. Moscow, 2008. 512 p. (In Russ.).
28. Kashanina T. V. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Legal Technique: a textbook]. 2nd ed., rev. Moscow, 2017. 496 p. (In Russ.).
29. Koldin V. Ya. Problema tekhnologiches¬kogo urovnya pravoprimeneniya [The Problem of the Technological Level of Law Enforcement]. Gosudarstvo i pravo – State and Law. 2014. Issue 3. Pp. 89–93. (In Russ.).
30. Kolesnik I. V. Teoreticheskaya model' pravoprimenitel'noy tekhnologii: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Theoretical Model of Law Enforcement Technology: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2014. 437 p. (In Russ.).
31. Kolokolov N. A. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika sudebnogo resheniya kak yavlenie pravovoy kul'tury [Legal Technique of Court Judgment as a Phenomenon of Legal Culture]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika – Juridical Techniques. 2016. Issue 10. Pp. 143–156. (In Russ.).
32. Korkunov N. M. Lektsii po obshchey teorii prava [Lectures on the General Theory of Law]. St. Petersburg, 1898. 354 р. (In Russ.).
33. Kuz'mina A. V. Formirovanie doktriny zashchity slaboy storony v dogovornom prave [Protection of the Weaker Party in Contract Law: Formation of the Doctrine]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 4. Pp. 698–727. (In Russ.).
34. Lupinskaya P. A. Resheniya v ugolovnom sudoproizvodstve: teoriya, zakonodatel'stvo, praktika [Decisions in Criminal Proceedings: Theory, Le¬gislation, Practice]. Moscow, 2010. 238 p. (In Russ.).
35. Mal'kevich V. V. Ob odnoy pravovoy konstruktsii [On One Legal Construction]. Voprosy Filosofii – Questions of Philosophy. 1965. Issue 6. Pp. 139–141. (In Russ.).
36. Pavlov A. A. Kommentariy k st. 8 GK RF [Commentary on Article 8 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Osnovnye polozheniya grazhdanskogo prava: postateynyy kommentariy k stat'yam 1-16.1 Grazhdanskogo kodeksa Rossiyskoy Federatsii [General Provisions of Civil Law: Article-by-Article Commentary on Articles 1-16.1 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Moscow, 2020. 1469 p. (In Russ.).
37. Polyakov S. B., Gilev I. A. Predmetnaya oblast' informatizatsii sudebnykh resheniy [The Subject Area of Informatization of Court Decisions]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2021. Issue 3. Pp. 462–487. (In Russ.).
38. Pronina M. P. Pravoprimenitel'naya yuridicheskaya tekhnika ugolovnogo zakonodatel'stva [Law Enforcement Juridical Technique of Criminal Legislation]. Biznes v zakone. Ekonomiko-yuridicheskiy zhurnal – Business in Law. 2016. Issue 5. Pp. 126–129. (In Russ.).
39. Professional'nye navyki yurista: opyt prakticheskogo obucheniya [Professional Skills of a Lawyer: Experience of Practical Training]. Moscow, 2001. 414 p. (In Russ.).
40. Puginskiy B. I. Pravovye sredstva povysheniya effektivnosti proizvodstva [Legal Means to Improve Production Efficiency]. Moscow, 1980. 144 p. (In Russ.).
41. Rafikova Z. L. Znachenie sistemy yuridicheskikh faktov v grazhdanskom prave [Significance of the System of Legal Facts in Civil Law]. Aktual'nye problemy ekonomiki i prava – Actual Problems of Economics and Law. 2014. Issue 1. Pp. 219–225. (In Russ.).
42. Rozhkova M. A. Ponyatie sudebnogo resheniya v kontekste stat'i 8 GK RF [The Concept of a Court Decision in the Context of Article 8 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation]. Khozyaystvo i pravo – Economy and Law. 2002. Issue 6. Pp. 53–64. (In Russ.).
43. Romashov R. A. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika i yuridicheskaya tekhnologiya: nekotorye problemy teoreticheskogo modelirovaniya i prakticheskogo vnedreniya [Legal Technique and Legal Technology: Some Problems of Theoretical Modeling and Practical Implementation]. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: voprosy teorii i praktiki: materialy mezhvuzovskoy nauchno-tekhnicheskoy konferentsii (Sankt-Peterburg, 17 iyulya 2005 g.). [Legal Technique: Issues of Theory and Practice: Proceedings of Interuniversity Scientific and Technical Conference (St. Petersburg, July 17, 2005,)]. St. Petersburg, 2005. P. 33–39. (In Russ.).
44. Ruzavin G. I. Metodologicheskie problemy argumentatsii [Methodological Problems of Argumentation]. Moscow, 1997. 90 p. (In Russ.).
45. Rusakova E. P., Gronik I. A., Kupchina E. V. Grazhdanskoe sudoproizvodstvo skvoz' priz¬mu tsifrovizatsii: opyt Rossii, SShA i Filippin [Civil Proceedings through the Prism of Digitalization: the Experience of Russia, the USA and the Philippines]. Moscow, 2021. 109 p. (In Russ.).
46. Ushakov A. A. Ocherki sovetskoy zakonodatel'noy stilistiki [Essays on Soviet Legislative Stylistics]. Perm, 1967. 314 p. (In Russ.).
47. Fedorchenko E. V. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika sudebnykh resheniy kak kriteriy urovnya pravovoy kul'tury [Legal Technique of Court Judgments as a Criterion for the Level of Legal Culture]. Pravovaya kul'tura – The Legal Culture. 2017. Issue 1 (28). Pp. 83–87. (In Russ.).
48. Firsova K. D. Pravorealizuyushchie akty-dokumenty kak element mekhanizma neposredst¬vennoy realizatsii prav i svobod lichnosti [Law Enforcement Acts-Documents as an Element of the Mechanism for the Direct Implementation of the Rights and Freedoms of the Individual]. Vestnik TGU – Tambov University Review. Series: Humanities. 2009. Issue 11. Pp. 417–422. (In Russ.).
49. Fridmen L. Vvedenie v amerikanskoe pravo [Introduction to American Law]. Moscow, 1992. 286 p. (In Russ.).
50. Khazova O. A. Iskusstvo yuridicheskogo pis'ma [The Art of Legal Writing]. Moscow, 2012. 181 p. (In Russ.).
51. Khokhlov S. A. Dogovornaya rabota [Contract Work]. Sverdlovsk, 1986. 128 p. (In Russ.).
52. Khokhlov S. A. Organizatsiya dogovornoy raboty v narodnom khozyaystve [Organization of Contract Work in the National Economy]. Krasnoyarsk, 1986. 160 p.
53. Cherdantsev A. F. Logiko-strukturnye fenomeny v prave, yuridicheskoy nauke i praktike [Logical-Structural Phenomena in Law, Legal Science and Practice]. Yekaterinburg, 1993. 189 p. (In Russ.).
54. Cherdantsev A. F. Yuridicheskie konstruktsii, ikh rol' v nauke i praktike [Legal Constructions, Their Role in Science and Practice]. Izvestiya vysshikh uchebnykh zavedeniy. Pravovedenie – Proceedings of Higher Educational Institutions. Pravovedenie. 1972. Issue 3. Pp. 12–14. (In Russ.).
55. Shekhovtsova A. S. Printsip zashchity slaboy storony dogovora s uchastiem sub''ektov predprinimatel'skoy deyatel'nosti [The Principle of Protecting the Weaker Party to the Contract with the Participation of Business Entities]. Vlast' Zakona – The Rule of Law. 2018. Issue 4. Pp. 243–251. (In Russ.).
56. Yuridicheskaya kontseptsiya robotizatsii [Legal Concept of Robotization: a monograph]. Ed. by Yu. A. Tikhomirov, S. B. Nanba. Moscow, 2019. 240 p. (In Russ.).
57. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika: kurs lektsiy [Legal Technique: A Course of Lectures]. Ed. by V. M. Baranov. Nizhny Novgorod, 2015. 648 p. (In Russ.).
58. Yuridicheskaya tekhnika [Legal Technique: a textbook]. O. V. Lazareva, N. I. Sukhova. Saratov, 2015. 316 p. (In Russ.).
59. Rusakova E. P. Robotization of Civil Proceedings: Reality or Future. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. 2022. Vol. 288. Pp. 211–217. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-9808-8_23. (In Eng.).
60. Rusakova E. P., Frolova E. E. Current Problems of Digital Justice in the BRICS Countries. Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies. 2022. Vol. 254. Pp. 143–153. DOI: 10.1007/978-981-16-4621-8_12. (In Eng.)
|
