Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 4 (46)

Title: CHILD'S RIGHT TO FAMILY EDUCATION: REGULATIVE DIMENSION OF THE ISSUE
Authors:

E. G. Komissarova, Perm State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0003-4257-5673
ResearcherID: E-9302-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       10.5829 / idosi.mejsr.2013.15.9.11540
10.5829 / idosi.wasj.2013.24.01.13177
10.17072/1995-4190-2015-2-61-70
10.17072/1995-4190-2018-42-644-663

T. V. Krasnova, Tyumen State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-3375-7443 ResearcherID: S-5442-2016
Articles of «Scopus» & «Web of Science»:       70:17072/19995-419-2016-1-60-67
10.17072/1995-4190-2016-34-426-439
Requisites: Komissarova E. G., Krasnova T. V. Pravo rebenka na semeynoe vospitanie: regulyativnyy aspect [Child's Right to Family Education: Regulative Dimension of the Issue]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Juridicheskie nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2019. Issue 46. Pp. 672–697. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-46-672-697
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2019-46-672-697
Annotation:

Introduction: the authors address theoretical and methodological issues of the parents' right to bring up a minor child. Theoretical background for choosing this research topic is inadequate tailoring of the legal theory of family education to the study of traditional family values and positive parenting relations. Hence, the place of jurisprudence in the cross-disciplinary doctrine of family education is not sufficiently obvious. Focusing on the need to develop a separate scientific discipline concerning the private-law position of a minor child within the family law theory, the authors address the issue of exercising the parental right to raise a child in its regulative dimension. They pose questions about family education as a social phenomenon and its correlation with public education; about subjects and participants of family education; about the individual non-property right of parents to raise a minor. Purpose: based on the current family law, to analyze legally possible and legally necessary patterns of parents' behavior and behavior of persons substituting parents in relation to family education of a minor. Methods: the methodological framework of the research is based on the general scientific (dialectical) method of cognition of family law relations. Specific scientific methods of cognition applied in jurisprudence were also used; these include legalistic and logical methods. The major method was the multidisciplinary approach expressed in the doctrine of family modernization in the changing world. Results: the seeming obviousness of everyday family education and insufficient educational representation of the family education theory in legal studies are the reasons for the situation when positive aspects of family education normally stay outside the dogmatic focus, while the attention is given to the protection-centered aspects associated with destructive and deviant phenomena in family education. To overcome this state of affairs, the authors suggest that family law theory should include section about the status of a minor in family law as its actual part. So far, this theory only exists speculatively, and therefore it is fragmented in nature. The initial phase of its formalization may be a change in the taxonomy of rules included in Chapters 11 and 12 of the Family Code of the Russian Federation. Proceeding from the theoretical and methodological premise prescribing what, how and why legal scholars should do to present the corresponding scientific domain, the authors investigated the procedure for exercising the personal non-property right to raise a child and the attendant priority of this right over other persons. The results of the study let the authors make conclusions about non-exhaustiveness of the list of personal non-property rights of parents aimed at raising a child (the 'positive symbol' rights), about the indivisibility, inalienability and strictly personal nature of the parents' right to raise their children; about inadmissibility of the parental refusal to exercise the right to raise a minor, and impossibility to transfer parental rights to other persons. The authors see their scientific contribution in the creation of the theoretical groundwork necessary for the legislator to build a developed, internally consistent system of rules that would construct an adequate interaction between the subjects of family education.

Keywords: parental rights; family education as an institution of law; personal non-property parental rights; subjects and participants of education; modernization of the family institution in the changing world
  download the full-version article
References: 1. Belov V. A. Kogda govorit pravo... [When the Law Says...]. Zakon – ZAKON. 2013. Issue 11. Pp. 75–87. (In Russ.).
2. Venttsel' K. N. Osvobozhdenie rebenka. Deklaratsiya prav rebenka [The Release of a Child. Declaration of the Children's Rights]. Smolensk, 1918. 50 p. (In Russ.).
3. Gribanov V. P. Osushchestvlenie i zashchita grazhdanskikh prav [Implementation and Protection of Civil Rights]. Moscow, 2000. 411 p. (In Russ.).
4. Dement'eva I. F., Golenkova Z. T. Teorii semeynogo vospitaniya v obshcheteoreticheskom kontekste sotsial'nykh nauk [Theory of Family Education in the General Theoretical Context of Social Sciences]. Vestnik Rossiyskogo universiteta Druzhby narodov. Seriya Sotsiologiya –RUDN Journal of Sociology. 2018. Issue 3. Pp. 542–554. (In Russ.).
5. Zvyagintseva L. M., Kuznetsova L. G. Zadachi sovershenstvovaniya zakonodatel'stva o brake i sem'e [Issues of Improving the Legislation on Marriage and Family]. Zakonodatel'stvo o brake i sem'e i praktika ego primeneniya (k 20-letiyu Osnov i KoBS RSFSR): mezhvuzovskiy sbornik nauchnykh trudov [Legislation on Marriage and Family and the Practice of Its Application (to the 20th Anniversary of the Foundations and RSFSR Code on Marriage and Family): Interuniversity Collection of Scientific Papers]. Sverdlovsk, 1989. Access from the legal reference system 'ConsultantPlus'. (In Russ.).
6. Il'in I. A. Pochemu my verim v Rossiyu: Sochineniya [Why We Believe in Russia: Essays]. Moscow, 2007. 919 p. (In Russ.).
7. Kapterev P. F. Istoriya russkoy pedagogiki [History of Russian Pedagogy]. St. Petersburg, 2004. 559 p. (In Russ.).
8. Kovyazina I. B., Bagirova A. P. Delegirovanie funktsiy roditel'skogo truda: vozmozhnosti sotsiologicheskogo izucheniya [Delegating Functions of Parental Labor: Opportunities for Sociological Study]. Strategiya razvitiya sotsial'nykh obshchnostey, institutov i territoriy. Materialy IV mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prak¬ti¬cheskoy konferentsii: v 2 tomakh. Nauchnyy red. A. P. Bagirova [Strategy of Development of Social Communities, Institutions and Territories. Proceedings of the IV International Scientific and Practical Conference: in 2 vols.; ed. by A. P. Bagirova]. Ekaterinburg, 2018. Pp. 114–117. (In Russ.).
9. Konstitutsii zarubezhnykh gosudarstv: Velikobritaniya, Frantsiya, Germaniya, SShA, Yaponiya, Braziliya: uchebnoe posobie [Constitutions of Foreign Counties: Great Britain, France, Germany, the USA, Japan, Brazil: Textbook]. Moscow, 2010. 624 p. (In Russ.).
10. Konstitutsii gosudarstv Evropy: v 3 t. / pod obshch. red. L. A. Okun'kova [Constitutions of European Countries: in 3 vols.; ed. by L. A. Okun'kov]. Moscow, 2001. Vol. 1. 824 p. (In Russ.).
11. Mardakhaev L. V. Semeynoe vospitanie: problemy i osobennosti [Family Education: Problems and Features]. Vestnik Chelyabinskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta - Bulletin of Chelyabinsk State University. 2014. Issue 13 (342). Pp. 173–178. (In Russ.).
12. Meyer D. I. Izbrannye trudy: v 2 t. / Vstupit. slovo prof. P. V. Krasheninnikova [Selected Works: in 2 vols.; prefaced by P. V. Krasheninnikov]. Moscow, 2019. Vol. 1. 848 p. (In Russ.).
13. Mironov B.N. Sotsial'naya istoriya Rossii perioda Imperii (XVIII – nachalo XX veka) [Social History of Russia during the Period of the Empire (18th-Early 20th Centuries)]. St. Petersburg, 2000. Vol. 1. 548 p. (In Russ.).
14. Mikheeva L. Yu. Razvitie rossiyskogo semeynogo zakonodatel'stva [Development of Russian Family Legislation]. Kodifikatsiya rossiyskogo chastnogo prava 2019 / pod red. D. A. Medvedeva [Codification of Russian Private Law 2019; ed. by D.A. Medvedev]. Moscow, 2019. 492 p. (In Russ.).
15. Nechaeva A. M. O napravleniyakh sovershenstvovaniya rossiyskogo semeynogo zakonodatel'stva [On the Directions of Improvement of Russian Family Legislation]. Teoreticheskie i prakticheskie voprosy sovremennoy nauki. Materialy konferentsii / otv. red. i sost. G.L. Shamatonova [Theoretical and Practical Issues of Modern Science. Conference Proceedings; ed. by G. L. Sha¬¬ma-tonova]. Yaroslavl, 2017. Pp. 63–67. (In Russ.).
16. Petrov D.A. Pravovoy status samoreguliruemoy organizatsii v sfere predprinimatel'stva: dis. ... d-ra yurid. nauk [Legal Status of a Self-Regulatory Organization in the Sphere of Entrepreneurship: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. St. Petersburg, 2016. 433 p. (In Russ.).
17. Smirnovskaya S. I. Ogranichenie roditel'skikh prav po semeynomu zakonodatel'stvu Rossiyskoy Federatsii: dis. ... kand. yurid. nauk [Restriction of Parental Rights under the Family Legislation of the Russian Federation: Synopsis of Cand. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2007. 176 p. (In Russ.).
18. Starosel'tseva M. M. O printsipakh osu¬shchestvleniya roditel'skikh prav [On the Principles of Parental Rights' Exercise]. Sovremennoe pravo – Modern Law. 2008. Issue 11. Pp. 36–38. (In Russ.).
19. Suslov A. A. Osobennosti otkaza ot otdel'nykh vidov sub''ektivnykh prav [Some Features of Waiver of Certain Types of the Subjective Rights]. Prolog: zhurnal o prave – Prologue: Law Journal. 2017. Issue 3. Pp. 12–20. (In Russ.).
20. Tarusina N. N. Babushki i dedushki kak sub''ekty semeynogo prava [Grandparents as Subjects of Family Law]. Semeynoe i zhilishchnoe pravo – Family and Housing Law. 2017. Issue 2. Pp. 19–21. (In Russ.).
21. Tatarintseva E. A. Modeli pravootnosheniy po vospitaniyu rebenka v sem'e i tendentsii ikh formirovaniya v natsional'nom semeynom prave [Models of Legal Relations in the Family Education of a Child and Tendencies of Their Formation in the National Family Law]. Moscow, 2018. 134 р. (In Russ.).
22. Khomenko I. A. K voprosu ob opredelenii ponyatiya «semeynoe vospitanie» [The Problem of the 'Family Education' Definition]. Uchenye zapiski Sankt-Peterburgskogo gosudarstvennogo instituta psikhologii i sotsial'noy raboty – Scientific Notes Journal of St. Petersburg State Institute of Psychology and Social Work. 2012. Issue 1. Vol. 17. Pp. 88–93. (In Russ.).
23. Shershenevich G. F. Kurs grazhdanskogo prava [The Course on Civil Law]. Tula, 2001. 719 p. (In Russ.).
24. Henrich D. Familienrecht. Walter de Gruyter, 2012. 346 p. (In Germ.).
25. Lamont R. Family Law. Oxford University Press, 2018. 648 p. (In Eng.).
26. Lowe N.V., Douglas G. Bromley's Family Law. Oxford University Press, 2015. 1127 p. (In Eng.)
Received: 21.04.2019
Financing: ---
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year