Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 2 (36)

Title: THE METHOD OF LEGAL EQUALITY OF THE PARTIES AND THE PRINCIPLE OF SUBORDINATION IN CORPORATE LAW OF RUSSIA
Authors:

Morozov S.Yu.,
Ulyanovsk State University

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.
ORCID: 0000-0002-1522-8046 ResearcherID: D-6939-2016
Статьи автора в БД «Scopus» и «Web of Science»:      

10.17072 / 1995-4190-2016-32-199-207

Requisites: Morozov S. Yu. Metod yuridicheskogo ravenstva storon i printsip podchineniya v korporativnom prave Rossii [The Method of Legal Equality of the Parties and the Principle of Subordination in Corporate Law of Russia]. Vestnik Permskogo Universiteta. Juridicheskie Nauki – Perm University Herald. Juridical Sciences. 2017. Issue 36. Pp. 181–191. (In Russ.). DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-36-181-191
DOI: 10.17072/1995-4190-2017-36-181-191
Annotation:

Introduction: the article discusses the legal nature of corporate relations. In civil law, it is assumed that the relations connected with corporate governance are based on the principle of subordination, but are not actually the relations of power and subordination. There is an opinion that relations of corporate governance are regulated by civil law and are a form of civil organizational relations. According to another position, such relations should be go­verned by two methods of legal regulation concurrently. Thus, of great importance is the task of answering the question on the possibility to regard relations of corporate governance as the subject of civil regulation. Purpose: to develop a scientific understanding of what branch of law relations of corporate governance belong to, based on the analysis of scientific literature and civil legislation. Methods: a systemic approach, methods of comparison, description, interpretation, theoretical methods of formal and dialectical logic were applied, as well as specific scientific methods as follows: a comparative legal method and interpretation of legal norms. Results: the analysis of the positions of scientists and the current civil legislation has shown that corporate governance relations are an integral part of the subject of civil law, different from property, personal non-property and organizational relations. Conclusions: it is necessary to distinguish between the power of public law and power of private law. Despite the opinion prevailing in the doctrine of civil law that relations of governance can only refer to public law, it is proved that these relations can be part of the subject of civil law. Such relations of power and subordination are regulated by the method of legal equality of the parties. At the same time, it is important not to confuse the subject and the method of civil regulation.

Keywords: corporate management; method of legal equality of the parties; principle of subordination; relations of power and subordination; relations of governance; organizational relations; powers and authority; subject of civil regulation
  download the full-version article
References:

1. Agarkov M. M. Izbrannye trudy po grazhdanskomu pravu [Selected Works on Civil Law]. Moscow, 2002. Vol. 2. 452 p. (In Russ.).
2. Alekseev S. S. Predmet sovetskogo sotsialisticheskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The Subject of Soviet Socialist Civil Law]. Sverdlovsk, 1959. 336 p. (In Russ.).
3. Belov V. A. Korporativnoe pravo: Aktual'nye problemy teorii i praktiki [Corporate Law: Current Problems of Theory and Practice; ed. by V. A. Belov]. Moscow, 2009. 678 p. (In Russ.).
4. Bogdanov E. V. Mesto korporativnogo prava v rossiyskoy pravovoy sisteme [The Place of Corporate Law in the Russian Legal System]. Zhurnal predprinimatel'skogo i korporativnogo prava – Journal of Entrepreneurship and Corporate Law. 2016. Issue 3. Pp. 30–34. (In Russ.).
5. Borodin E., Prudnikov M., Popov G. Upravlenie kak sredstvo kompensatsii sotsial'nogo samoupravleniya [Management as a Tool of Social Self-Management Compensation]. Vlast' – Vlast' (The Authority). 2013. Issue 9. Pp. 134–138. (In Russ.).
6. Braginskiy M. I. Obshchee uchenie o khozyaystvennykh dogovorakh [General Theory of Economic Contracts]. Minsk, 1967. 260 p. (In Russ.).
7. Bratus' S. N. Imushchestvennye i organiza-tsionnye otnosheniya i ikh pravovoe regulirovanie v SSSR [Property and Organizational Relations and Their Legal Regulation in the USSR]. Voprosy obshchey teorii sovetskogo prava – Issues of General Theory of Soviet Law. Moscow, 1960. Pp. 67‒120. (In Russ.).
8. Bratus' S. N. Predmet i sistema sovetskogo grazhdanskogo prava [The Subject and System of Soviet Civil Law]. Moscow, 1963. 197 p. (In Russ.).
9. Gabov A. V. Sdelki s zainteresovannost'yu v praktike aktsionernykh obshchestv: problemy pravovogo regulirovaniya [Transactions of Interest in the Practice of Corporations: Problems of Legal Regulation]. Moscow, 2005. 412 p. (In Russ.).
10. Grazhdanskiy kodeks Rossiyskoy Federatsii. Postateyny kommentariy k glavam 1–5 [The Civil Code of the Russian Federation. Commentaries to Chapters 1–5; ed. by L. V. Sanni¬kova]. Moscow, 2015. 662 p. (In Russ.).
11. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik [Сivil Law: Textbook: in 2 vols.; ed. by E. A. Sukhanov]. Moscow, 1998. Vol. 1. 816 p. (In Russ.).
12. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Uchebnik [Сivil Law: Textbook: in 2 vols; ed. by B.M. Gongalo]. Moscow, 2016. Vol. 1. 511 p. (In Russ.).
13. Egorov N. D. Grazhdansko-pravovoe reguliro¬vanie obshchestvennykh otnosheniy: edinstvo i differentsiatsiya [Civil Regulation of Social Relations: Unity and Differentiation]. Lenin¬grad, 1988. 176 p. (In Russ.).
14. Ioffe O. S. Pravootnoshenie po sovetskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Legal Relationship under Soviet Civil Law]. Leningrad, 1949. 143 p. (In Russ.).
15. Kozlova N. V. Pravosub"ektnost' yuridiches-kogo litsa po rossiyskomu grazhdanskomu pravu [Legal Personality of Legal Entity under Russian Civil Law: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2004. 449 p. (In Russ.).
16. Krasavchikov O. A. Organizatsionnye grazh-dansko-pravovye otnosheniya. [Organizational Civil Law Relations]. Antologiya ural'skoy tsivilistiki. 1925–1989: sbornik statey – Anthology of the Ural Civil Law. 1925–1989: Collected Works]. Moscow, 2001. Pp. 156–165 (In Russ.).
17. Laptev V. V. Predmet i sistema khozyayst-vennogo prava [The Subject and System of Economic Law]. Moscow, 1968. 175 p. (In Russ.).
18. Mozolin V. P. Vosem' let spustya [Eight Years Later]. Zakonodatel'stvo i ekonomika – Law and Economics. 2012. Issue 10. Pp. 5–8. (In Russ.).
19. Molotnikov A. E. Otvetstvennost' v aktsioner¬nykh obshchestvakh [Responsibility in Joint Stock Companies]. Access from the legal reference system ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.).
20. Pakhomova N. N. Tsivilisticheskaya teoriya korporativnykh otnosheniy [Civil Law Theory of Corporate Relations]. Ekaterinburg, 2005. 336 p. (In Russ.).
21. Postateynyy kommentariy k Grazhdanskomu kodeksu Rossiyskoy Federatsii, chasti pervoy [Commentaries to Part One of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation; ed. by P. V. Krashenin¬nikov]. Moscow, 2011. Access from the legal reference system ConsultantPlus. (In Russ.).
22. Pravovoe regulirovanie sotsial'no-ekonomi-cheskikh otnosheniy v usloviyakh reform [Legal Regulation of Socio-Economic Relations in the Conditions of Reforms; ed. by Z. M. Fat¬kudinov, Z. A. Akhmet'yanova]. Kazan, 2004. 360 p. (In Russ.).
23. Kharitonova Yu. S. Otrazhenie funktsii uprav¬leniya v institutakh grazhdanskogo prava [The Reflection of the Control Function in the Civil Law Institutions: Dr. jurid. sci. diss.]. Moscow, 2011. 450 p. (In Russ.).
24. Kharitonova Yu. S. Upravlenie v grazhdanskom prave: problemy teorii i praktiki [Management in Civil Law: Problems of Theory and Practice]. Moscow, 2011. 304 p. (In Russ.).
25. Yuridicheskie litsa v rossiyskom grazhdanskom prave: monografiya: v 3 t. [Legal Entities in Russian Civil Law: Monograph: in 3 vols.; ed. by A. V. Gabov, O. V. Gutnikov, S. A. Sini¬tsyn]. Vol. 1. Obshchie polozheniya o yuridi¬cheskikh litsakh [General Provisions on Legal Entities]. Moscow, 2015. 384 p. (In Russ.).
26. Yakovlev V. F. Grazhdansko-pravovoy metod regulirovaniya obshchestvennykh otnosheniy: ucheb. posobie [Civil Law Method of Regu¬lating Social Relations: textbook]. Sverdlovsk, 1972. 210 p. (In Russ.).
27. Yakovlev V. F. Izbrannye trudy. Grazhdanskoe pravo: Istoriya i sovremennost'. Kniga 1 [Se¬lected Works. Civil law: History and Moder¬nity. Book 1]. Moscow, 2012. Vol. 2. 976 p. (In Russ.).
28. Arlt M.-A. Französische Aktiengesellschaft. Monistisches und dualistisches System im Spannungsfeld der Corporate Governanct. Wien, 2006. 420 p. (In Germ.).
29. Brian R. Cheffins. The History of Corporate Governance. Available at: http://papers.ssrn.
com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1975404 (ac¬cessed 03.02.2017). (In Eng.).
30. Civil Law. Microsoft Encarta Online Encyclo¬pedia 2000. Available at: http://encarta.msn.
com. (accessed 03.02.2017). (In Eng.).
31. Freund E. J. U. D. The Legal Nature of Corporations. Batoche Books. Kitchener, 2000. 66 p. (In Eng.).
32. Gierke O. V. Das deutsche Genossens-chaftsrecht. 4 Bde. Berlin, 1868–1913. 567 p. (In Germ.).
33. Gierke O. V. Deutsches Privatrecht (Binding's Systematishes Handbuch der deutschen Rechtswissenschaft). Berlin, 1895. 864 p. (In Germ.).
34. Grunewald V. Gesellschaftrecht [Company Law]. 3 Aufl. Tubingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1999. 422 p. (In Germ.).
35. Hansmann H., Kraakman R. The End of History for Corporate Law. Yale Law School Working Paper. No. 235; NYU Working Paper. No. 013. 34 p. (In Eng.).
36. Harvard Law School Discussion Paper. No. 280; Yale SOM Working Paper. No. ICF-00-09. Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=
204528 (accessed 03.02.2017). (In Eng.).
37. Hefermehl. Spindler in Munchener Kommentar zum Aktiengesetz, 2004, § 76, Rdnr. 57 p. (In Germ.).
38. Hueck G., Windbichler Ch. Gesellschaftsrecht. 20. Aufl. München, 2003. 620 p. (In Germ.).
39. Joerges C., Collins H., Lyon-Caen A., Muir Watt H., Teubner G., Q Whitman J. The constitution of private governance. The Constitution of Private Governance. Available at: http://ebook.umaha.ac.id/E-BOOK%20ON
%20LAW,%20CONSTITUTION%20&%20LEGAL%20INSTRUMENT/CONSTITUTIONAL%20LAW/THE%20CONSTITUTION%20OF%20PRIVAT%20GOVERNANCE%20%5BHarm%20Schepel%5D.pdf (accessed 03.02.2017). (In Eng.).
40. Kalls S., Nowotny Ch., Schauer M. Ȍster-richisches Gesellschaftsrecht. Wien, 2008. 1361 p. (In Germ.).
41. Kalls S., Schauer M. Die Reform des Öster-reichischen Kapitalgesellschaftsrecht: Gutachten zum 16. Österreichischen Juristentag. Wien, 2006. 364 p. (In Germ.).
42. Klunzinger E. Grundzuge des Gesellschafts-rechts. 6-Aufl.: Vahlen, 1990. Pp. 367–372. (In Germ.).
43. Kubler F. Gesellschaftrecht. 5 Aufl. Heidel-berg: S F. Muller, 1998. 456 p. (In Germ.).
44. L'absence de personnalite morale dans les societes. JCP – La Semaine Juridique Notariale et Immobiliere. No. 51–52, 22 decembre 2000. (In French).
45. Meier-Hayoz A., Forstmoser P. Schweize-risches Gesellschaftrecht. VIII. Auflage, Bern 1998. Pp. 260, 280, 550. (In Germ.).
46. Merkt H., Göthel S.R. US-amerikanisches Gesellschaftsrecht. 2. Aufl. Frankfurt a. M., 2006. P. 90 ff. (In Germ.).
47. Mertens in Kolner Kommentar zum Aktien-gesetz, 2. Auflage, 2004, Kommentierung der § 76 Rn. 24, 25. (In Germ.).
48. Saleilles. De la personnalite juridique. Paris, 1922. 550 p. (In French).
49. Schmidt K. Gesellschaftsrecht. 3 Aufl. Köln, Berlin, Bonn, München: Carl Heymanns, 1997. 510 p. (In Germ.).
50. Stelzer M. A. Beschrānkte Haftung und unter¬nehmerische Verantwortung. Wien. NWV. 358 p. (In Germ.).
51. Tong Rou. The General Principles of Civil Law of the PRC: Its Berth, Characteristics, and Role. Transl. by Jonathan K. Ocko. Law and Contemporary Problems. Vol. 52. Issue 2. P. 160. (In Eng.).
52. U. S. Corporate Law Materials. Presentation Materials and Selected Statute and Case Law Excerpts P. 25. Available at: http://www.
arbitr.ru/_upimg/8B4729A66A4574D8B652815751AC0A68 _USRF (accessed 03.02.2017) (In Eng.).
53. Vahram D. Avetisyan. Modern Issues of Corporate Legislation and the Ways of Their Solution in the Republic of Armenia. Available at: http://ysu.am/files/Vahram_Ave¬tisyan.pdf. P. 151 (accessed 03.02.2017). (In Eng.).
54. Vavrovsky N. Stimmbindungsvertrȁge in Gesellschaftrecht. Wien, 2000. Pp. 121–123. (In Germ.).
55. Wiedemann Lutter M. (Hrsg.). Gestaltungs-freiheit im Gesellschaftsrecht. Berlin. Zeits-chrift für Unternehmens und Gesellschaftrecht II. ZGR-Symposion 25 Jahre ZGR. Hrsg. von Marcus Lutter und Herbert Wiedemann. Berlin; New York: de Gruyter, 1997. Available
at: https://www.degruyter.com/downloadpdf/
books/9783110908091/9783110908091.fm/9783110908091.fm.pdf (accessed 03.02.2017). (In Germ.).
 

Financing: ---
The Perm State University
614068, Perm, street Bukireva, 15 (Faculty of Law), +7 (342) 2 396 275
vesturn@yandex.ru
ISSN 1995-4190 ISSN (eng.) 2618-8104
ISSN (online) 2658-7106
DOI 10.17072/1995-4190
(с) Editorial board, 2010
The magazine is registered in Federal Agency of supervision in sphere of communication and mass communications.
The certificate on registration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-33087 from September, 5th, 2008
The certificate on reregistration of mass media ПИ № ФС77-53189 from Marth, 14th, 2013

The magazine is included in List ВАК and in the Russian index of scientific citing

The founder & Publisher: the State educational institution of the higher training
“The Perm State University”.
Publishing 4 times a year